Road Traffic and Injury Risk in Ethnic Minority Populations

 

Road Traffic and Injury Risk in Ethnic Minority Populations

May 20, 2021

ROAD TRAFFIC AND INJURY RISK IN ETHNIC MINORITY POPULATIONS

Understanding the evidence available to researchers, assessing risk, and proposals for future investigations
Over the last year Agilysis have been investigating how we can examine how road casualties different according to ethnic background. We have studied the available data and obtained permission from the Department for Transport to match postcode data to know ethnic backgrounds.

The results are stark: People from poorer communities are more likely to be killed or seriously injured on Britain’s roads, with those from ethnic minority groups more at risk.

The ‘Road traffic and injury risk in ethnic minority populations’ report, produced by Agilysis and walking charity Living Streets, examined four groups of pedestrian casualties: ethnic minority (excluding white minorities) pedestrians living in deprived areas; white pedestrians living in deprived areas; ethnic minority (excluding white minorities) pedestrians living in non-deprived areas; and white pedestrians living in non-deprived areas.
Road Traffic and Injury Risk in Ethnic Minority Populations

Access the full report findings here

View

The report finds that deprived ethnic minority (excluding white minority) pedestrians are more than three times more likely to be a casualty on Britain’s roads than white non-deprived pedestrians. Deprivation more than doubles the risk of becoming a pedestrian casualty. But even when deprivation is taken into account, people from an ethnic minority (excluding white minorities) are 25% more likely to be injured than white pedestrians.

The research looked at ten years of GB collision data for correlations between risk and community deprivation and ethnicity.

This increased risk may be due, in part, to the amount of time spent as a pedestrian, or employment patterns. People from ethnic minority groups and poorer communities are more likely to walk and less likely to have a car.

More details can be found in the report which has been produced by Agilysis using its own resources. We hope to work with interested parties to explore the evidence in more detail, understand community risk profiles in more depth, and hopefully find solutions to address this inequality.


Related News

June 26, 2024

Enforcement technologies – changing hearts and minds through a new Safe System lens

As we look to the future, the integration of connected and autonomous vehicles (CAVs), mobility-as-a-service (MaaS), and novel enforcement technologies like passive alcohol detection and speed-limiting geofencing, highlight the ongoing need for strategic, systemic approaches to transport safety. Embracing behavioural measures and leveraging new technologies can further advance our goal of safe, sustainable, and equitable mobility for all.
June 13, 2024

Why do we need 20mph?

Explore the transformative impact of 20mph speed limits with insights from Wales and beyond. Recent data reveals a significant reduction in road casualties following the implementation of 20mph limits in Wales, underscoring their potential to enhance road safety. Agilysis's Traffic Insights report using connected vehicle data highlighted a 2.4mph reduction in average speeds. This aligns with the broader trend of adopting Vision Zero and Safe System methodologies, which prioritize human safety by setting speed limits that reduce fatality risks for pedestrians and cyclists. Discover how these changes are making roads safer and what further measures can be implemented for greater impact.

Contact us

Contact us to discuss your specific needs
info@agilysis.co.uk
+44 (0) 1295 731 811
X